Film Review: Fear of Bot by S.Radovanovic
Futurama is a film directed by the same man who created "The Simpsons". That's not hard to notice, as all the characters are same as ones in popular TV series.
The main character in the film is Fry, a pizza delivery boy, who ended up in a time capsule and wakes up in the year 3000. In a totally new world he meets two new friends: robot Bender and one-eye girl, Leela. As the film continues they will be assigned to deliver lug nuts on planet Chapek 9, inhabited by robots. During the mission they knew that robots on Chapek 9 hate humans and if they see one, they will immediately kill him. So they decided Bender to go and deliver the lug nuts. But unexpectedly Bender gets caught by other robots. He manages to send a signal to a space ship where Fry and Leela were. They both decide to disguise into robots using metal beans and stuff they could find and rescue Bender. After they find him, he refuses their offer of rescue, because he likes the planet. Meanwhile Fry and Leela were placed on a trial and all the robots started looking for them. They were found and Bender was ordered to kill his friends.
If you want to know whether this story has a happy ending or not, you should see it. I would recommend it to anyone, even elders. It is full of humour, good jokes, excitement and new unusual things. Meed the Robot Elders and find out more about 3000 blernsball. You'll definitely like it.
posted by Lingva Blogger at 2:26 AM
4 Comments:
Adequate opening sentence that gives the reader some indication of your opinion.
Multiple grammatical errors.
One or two spelling errors (typing error ˝meed˝ instead of ˝meet˝).
Appropriate word choices.
Solid sentence structure (S.V.O.)
Good transitions.
12:05 PM
Adequate opening sentence that gives the reader some indication of your opinion. Mentions key performers and the roles they play. Mentions the important technical aspects of the film and the individuals responsible for these accomplishments or failures. Provides an overly detailed plot synopsis of the film or a synopsis that does not quite give the reader enough information. Makes appropriate comparisons to other films (similar genres, performers, directors). Provides some examples of action / dialogue from the film that supports their ideas about the film's effectiveness. Voices an opinion about the films' merit and points out the film's successes but does not explain why these things worked. One typing error. One or two grammatical errors. No punctuation errors. Appropriate word choices. One or two poorly constructed sentences. Good transitions.
12:19 PM
Mentions key performers and the roles they play.
Mentions the important technical aspects of the film.
Provides synopsis that does not quite give the reader enough information.
Makes no comparisons to other films.
Provides some examples of action but no dialogue from the film that supports their ideas about the film's effectiveness.
Voices an opinion about the films' merit and points out the film's successes and failures but does not explain why these things worked or did not work.
12:35 PM
Comments made by K. Vicentijevic and K. Mijatovic
12:45 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home